2016 (12) TMI 970
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Gupta, Advocates for the Appellant (s) Shri Pawan Kumar Singh, Supdt. (A.R.) for the Department Per Mr. Anil G. Shakkarwar: The present appeal is preferred against Order-in-Appeal No.28/CE/APPL/NOIDA/07 dated 30.03.2007. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellants were manufacturers of Air Conditioners and its parts and availed Cenvat facility and were registered with the de....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Rules, 2002, demanding an amount of Rs. 3,34,546.48/-. In the meantime, the appellant reversed Rs. 1,91,389/- through various entries dated 21.07.2002, 31.08.2002, 31.10.2002 and 05.01.2003, treating the said amount as attributable Cenvat Credit availed on the inputs that have gone into the manufacture of said exempted goods. The Original Authority through Order-in-Original No.17/AC/N-IV/06 dated ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....n their RT-12 returns and elaborated that whenever they made payment of Cenvat Credit on inputs used in the manufacture of exempted goods, in the RT-12 returns as RG-23A part-II register and PLA register, they clearly mentioned that amount has been paid on reversal of Cenvat Credit of inputs used in the manufacture of exempted goods and there are large number of Ruling by various appellate fora th....
TaxTMI