<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 970 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336325</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the Orders-in-Original and Appeal due to the show cause notice being barred by limitation. The transparency in reversing credit and compliance with regulations played a crucial role in the decision, supported by relevant appellate rulings and the retrospective application of relevant provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2016 20:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452176" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 970 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336325</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the Orders-in-Original and Appeal due to the show cause notice being barred by limitation. The transparency in reversing credit and compliance with regulations played a crucial role in the decision, supported by relevant appellate rulings and the retrospective application of relevant provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336325</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>