<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 970 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336325</link>
    <description>A show cause notice demanding reversal-related amount was found unsustainable because it had been issued beyond the normal limitation period. The Tribunal treated limitation as fatal to the notice, with the result that the consequential demand and penalty could not survive. The demand was therefore set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2016 20:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452176" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 970 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336325</link>
      <description>A show cause notice demanding reversal-related amount was found unsustainable because it had been issued beyond the normal limitation period. The Tribunal treated limitation as fatal to the notice, with the result that the consequential demand and penalty could not survive. The demand was therefore set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336325</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>