Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2001 (5) TMI 954

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Metropolitan Area Act, 1972 imposes a levy on the entry of specified goods into the Calcutta Metropolitan Area "for consumption, use or sale therein..."Section 19 of the Act provides for refund of the tax where the prescribed authority is satisfied that any specified goods upon which the tax had been paid, had been exported or conveyed out of the Calcutta Metropolitan Area within a period of six m....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed in these machines, wanted demonstration. It was demon strated". The respondents then wanted to remove the said machine from the Calcutta Metropolitan Area within six months of its entry therein and applied for a refund of the tax paid thereon under the provisions of Section 19. The application ultimately came to be heard by the West Bengal Taxation Tribunal. By the order that is impugned in thi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ection 19. 4. We are unable to accept the submission on behalf of the respondents. This is not a case where a machine had only been displayed. As the affidavit on behalf of the respondents makes clear, a demonstration of the said machine was sought and it was given. In other words, the machine was started up and its working was shown. It was, therefore, used and it is of no consequence that the....