<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (5) TMI 954 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188880</link>
    <description>SC ruled that demonstrating a Heidelberg printing press at an exhibition constitutes &quot;use&quot; under the Calcutta Metropolitan Area tax law, even without charging fees. The Court rejected the claim for tax refund, holding that operating the machine during exhibition triggers taxation, irrespective of commercial intent. The appeal was allowed, overturning the Tribunal&#039;s previous refund decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 16:16:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (5) TMI 954 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188880</link>
      <description>SC ruled that demonstrating a Heidelberg printing press at an exhibition constitutes &quot;use&quot; under the Calcutta Metropolitan Area tax law, even without charging fees. The Court rejected the claim for tax refund, holding that operating the machine during exhibition triggers taxation, irrespective of commercial intent. The appeal was allowed, overturning the Tribunal&#039;s previous refund decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188880</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>