2016 (11) TMI 861

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or the Appellant : Shri Raj Vyas, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri G. Jha, Authorised Representative ORDER Per Dr. D.M. Misra; These three appeals are filed against OIA-SRP-216-220-DMN-2012-13 dated 05.02.2013 passed by Commissioner (Appeals), Central Excise Daman. 2. Brief facts of the case are that M/s. Vardhman Polypacks, the appellant Firm was engaged in the manufacture of Pla....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of the Appellant Firm. Hence, the present appeals. 3. Ld. Advocate for the appellants submits that M/s. Vardhman Polypacks, a partnership firm, has paid entire duty liability, interest and 25% of the penalty imposed as ordered by the original adjudicating authority. He submits that their appeal was rejected by the Commissioner (Appeals) without considering their submission that they had dischar....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lant M/s. Vardhman Polypacks is infructuous. In case of other appellants, he submits that the penalties have already been reduced substantially by the Commissioner (Appeals), hence, their pleas for further reduction is not acceptable. 5. In rejoinder, ld. Advocate for the appellants submits that since they had complied with the condition of Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act by depositing 2....