<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 861 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334843</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal by the manufacturing firm as withdrawn after finding that the firm had paid the duty, interest, and penalty within the specified time, making them eligible for the benefit of discharging 25% of the penalty. The penalty on a partner was deemed unsustainable as the penalty on the partnership firm had already been imposed and confirmed. The penalty on an employee was reduced from Rs. 25,000 to Rs. 10,000 considering the employee&#039;s role and in the interest of justice. The appeals were disposed of based on compliance with penalty conditions and legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2016 12:57:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448704" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 861 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334843</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal by the manufacturing firm as withdrawn after finding that the firm had paid the duty, interest, and penalty within the specified time, making them eligible for the benefit of discharging 25% of the penalty. The penalty on a partner was deemed unsustainable as the penalty on the partnership firm had already been imposed and confirmed. The penalty on an employee was reduced from Rs. 25,000 to Rs. 10,000 considering the employee&#039;s role and in the interest of justice. The appeals were disposed of based on compliance with penalty conditions and legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334843</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>