2016 (9) TMI 1026

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....i/by M/s. PDS Legal for the Petitioners. Mr. Swapnil Bangur with Mr. Vipul A. Bajpayee for the Respondents. ORDER P.C: Heard both sides. 2. In the view that we have taken, we refuse to grant any adjournment to Mr. Bangur, appearing on behalf of the respondents. Mr. Bangur wants an adjournment to check as to whether the statements made post the Attachment Order in a letter dated 1972....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....her the petitioners have cleared the entire sum of Rs. 3,41,82,926/or anything is balance. 4. In pursuance of this impugned notice at AnnexureA, page 39, the petitioners pointed out on 1972016 (AnnexureV) that the dues demanded towards service tax of Rs. 31,25,815/, interest on the same amount and interest on Rs. 3,10,57,111/though not payable, in order to have the attachment lifted, by letters....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ayable. Here the assessees have stated on oath before this Court that no amount as is now sought to be claimed is due and payable. 8. It is not as if the Revenue is remediless in as much as it can take the route of adjudication by issuing a show cause notice, giving a party like the petitioners opportunity to place its version and thereafter pass an order assigning reasons. That order, for its ....