https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332765 The High Court refused to grant an adjournment to respondents seeking time to verify post-Attachment Order statements. Petitioners contested an Attachment Order for service tax dues, claiming substantial payments. Despite payments, the Revenue continued the attachment, prompting court criticism for coercive tactics. The judgment stressed due process, disallowing coercive collection of disputed dues. The writ petition was allowed, quashing the attachment and releasing bank accounts. Legal procedures and assessees' rights in disputed dues cases were underscored. en-us Mon, 08 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Nov 2016 16:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332765 The High Court refused to grant an adjournment to respondents seeking time to verify post-Attachment Order statements. Petitioners contested an Attachment Order for service tax dues, claiming substantial payments. Despite payments, the Revenue continued the attachment, prompting court criticism for coercive tactics. The judgment stressed due process, disallowing coercive collection of disputed dues. The writ petition was allowed, quashing the attachment and releasing bank accounts. Legal procedures and assessees' rights in disputed dues cases were underscored. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 08 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332765