Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2011 (2) TMI 1477

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ng the addition of Rs. 1,38,00,000/- made by the AO on account of share capital u/s 68 of the I.T. Act, treating the same as unexplained. The CIT(A) also enhanced the assessee's income by an amount of Rs. 92 lakh by making a further addition on account of unexplained cash credit representing share capital. The assessee preferred an application for rectification u/s 154 of the Act before the CIT(A). 3. The assessee also filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order before the Tribunal. At the time of hearing of the appeal before the Tribunal, the assessee filed an application contending that all the additions disputed by the assessee in the appeal before the Tribunal had since been deleted by the CIT(A), vide order dated 23.01.2009, dispo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ere not genuine; that not only was the addition confirmed by the CIT(A), the CIT(A) enhanced the same, the writ petition filed by the assessee against which enhancement was dismissed by the Hon'ble High Court; that while enhancing the addition made on account of share capital, the CIT(A) had relied on 'CIT vs. Divine Lasing & Finance Ltd.' reported in 298 ITR 268 (Del.); that vide order dated 23.01.2009 passed u/s 154 of the Act, the CIT(A) had reversed his earlier order of confirmation and enhancement of the addition made by the AO on account of bogus share capital that the CIT(A) observed that 'Divine Leasing & Finance Ltd.' (supra) had been reversed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in 'CIT vs. Lovely Export P. Ltd.' reported in 216 CTR 195 (....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....en wrongly recorded; and that change in the conclusion amounts to a review of the earlier order, which is not permissible u/s 154 of the Act. 6. Ld.Counsel for the assessee contends that in the Tribunal's order dated 16.02.2009 (supra), passed in the assessee appeal, the Tribunal has granted liberty to move an application for revival of the assessee's appeal if the order passed by the CIT(A) passed u/s 154 of the Act were to be disturbed by the Tribunal; that the CIT(A)'s said order passed on 23.01.2009 u/s 154 of the Act has now been disturbed by way of the Tribunal order dated 29.01.2010 (supra), allowing the assessee's appeal in ITA No.1247/Del./09; that as is available from the Tribunal order dated 16.02.2009, the assessee's appeal h....