https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186035 The Tribunal allowed the department's appeal against the CIT(A)'s order, which had confirmed and enhanced additions made by the AO on account of bogus share capital. The Tribunal found the earlier order unsustainable due to subsequent legal developments and reversed it. Consequently, the Tribunal revived the assessee's appeal for further consideration following the High Court's directive to consider the revival application in accordance with previous liberty granted. en-us Fri, 25 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Sep 2016 13:11:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186035 The Tribunal allowed the department's appeal against the CIT(A)'s order, which had confirmed and enhanced additions made by the AO on account of bogus share capital. The Tribunal found the earlier order unsustainable due to subsequent legal developments and reversed it. Consequently, the Tribunal revived the assessee's appeal for further consideration following the High Court's directive to consider the revival application in accordance with previous liberty granted. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 25 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186035