2016 (9) TMI 77

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....with Shri M.P. Joshi, Advocate, for the Appellants. Shri Hitesh Shah, Commissioner (AR), for the Respondent. ORDER: Per: M.V. Ravindran This appeal is directed against letter No. LTU/Mum/C. Ex/Adj-1/ST-Ref/Bajaj/2008 dated 4.11.2009, vide which, Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, LTU, Mumbai, rejected the claim of the appellant to avail cenvat credit of the service tax paid on the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... view that letter dated 4.11.2009 which is communicating a decision which is detrimental to the financial interest of appellant is a decision which can be entertained in appeal under Section 35B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. 4. On merits we find that the appellant is staking the claim for availment of cenvat credit on the ground, that, the Pant Nagar plant is paying excise duty on the goods wh....