https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331816 The Tribunal determined that a letter from the Commissioner rejecting the appellant's claim constituted an appealable decision under Section 35B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal found that the Commissioner had not adequately examined the appellant's claim for cenvat credit on goods manufactured at the Pant Nagar plant and remanded the issue for reconsideration. The Commissioner was directed to conduct a thorough review within three months, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive evaluation and a speaking order. en-us Tue, 31 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Dec 2016 10:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331816 The Tribunal determined that a letter from the Commissioner rejecting the appellant's claim constituted an appealable decision under Section 35B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal found that the Commissioner had not adequately examined the appellant's claim for cenvat credit on goods manufactured at the Pant Nagar plant and remanded the issue for reconsideration. The Commissioner was directed to conduct a thorough review within three months, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive evaluation and a speaking order. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 31 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331816