Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2009 (1) TMI 888

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ndsore(M.P.) for the offences punishable under Section 18 read with Section 8 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short 'the Act'). The prosecution case was that the Superintendent-M.C.Vijay of the Central Bureau of Narcotics, along with other officers, were on patrol duty on 1.5.1997 and at about 9.45 p.m. they intercepted the truck-DIG 4753. Two persons were ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....und all the four guilty under Section 18 of the Act and they were sentenced to undergo 10 years rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 1 lac each. In the appeal filed by the accused, the High Court confirmed the conviction. The first and second accused Hardeo Singh and Daljeet Singh did not prefer any appeal while accused nos.3 and 4 have filed the present appeals before this Court. Heard bot....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... is not proved, one could only say that it is not possible to assume that they were dealing with any commercial quantity of contraband articles, which offence by itself is of a very serious nature. The prosecution should have produced better evidence to sustain such conviction. Under the above circumstances, we hold that the accused could only be convicted under Section 18(b) of the Act. We are....