https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184091 Section 67 statements were treated as admissible, but the prosecution failed to prove with reliable evidence the quantity of contraband or satisfactorily connect the seized articles to the appellants. As the material did not establish involvement with commercial quantity, the conviction could not be sustained to that extent. The Supreme Court sustained the conviction only for dealing in narcotic drugs under Section 18(b). Considering the long period of custody already undergone, the sentence was treated as sufficient and the fine was waived. en-us Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Jun 2016 12:57:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184091 Section 67 statements were treated as admissible, but the prosecution failed to prove with reliable evidence the quantity of contraband or satisfactorily connect the seized articles to the appellants. As the material did not establish involvement with commercial quantity, the conviction could not be sustained to that extent. The Supreme Court sustained the conviction only for dealing in narcotic drugs under Section 18(b). Considering the long period of custody already undergone, the sentence was treated as sufficient and the fine was waived. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184091