2016 (6) TMI 862
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....sp; Shri V M Doiphode, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Shri J Nagori, Authorised Representative ORDER This application is filed by Revenue seeking Rectification Of Mistake in the Tribunal Order No A/11528-11532/2015 dtd 20.10.2015. 2. Heard both sides and perused the records. 3. The Ld AR for the Revenue submits that there are two mistakes apparent on record in the ab....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....2015". 4. Ld AR for the Revenue further submits that the second mistake in the said order of the of the Tribunal is that at Para 6 of the subject order the Tribunal has taken into consideration a letter dt 13.10.2015 of the Principal Commissioner of Customs which stated that the four shipping bills concerned in the appeals were assessed finally. He submits that the said information in the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nces. Hence, the matter has to be gone into detail and argued at length which would amount to review of the Order of the Tribunal dtd 20.10.2015 which is not permitted by law. He relies upon the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CCE, Belapur, Mumbai vs. RDC Concrete (I) P Ltd -2011(270)ELT.625 (SC). 6. On careful consideration of the arguments of both sides and perusal ....
TaxTMI