<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 862 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329153</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s application for rectification, correcting the order to address the mistake related to the disposal of appeals. The Tribunal did not agree to rectify the issue concerning the assessment of shipping bills, emphasizing that a detailed review of evidence was not permissible under the law. The decision was made in accordance with legal principles, citing the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in a similar case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 13:16:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432624" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 862 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329153</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s application for rectification, correcting the order to address the mistake related to the disposal of appeals. The Tribunal did not agree to rectify the issue concerning the assessment of shipping bills, emphasizing that a detailed review of evidence was not permissible under the law. The decision was made in accordance with legal principles, citing the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in a similar case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>