Upgrade to AI Search ✕

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
     - Overview Summary
     - Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     - Relevant Case Laws
     - Tariff / Classification / HSN
     - Expert views from TaxTMI
     - Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

TMI Blog

Home /

Previous Next

2016 (6) TMI 775

X X X X Extracts X X X X

Full Text of the Document

X X X X Extracts X X X X

....ER Per R. K. Singh The appeal is filed against Order in Original dated 02.03.2009 in terms of which service tax demand of Rs. 86,03,009/- was confirmed for the period 10.09.2004 to 30.09.2007 alongwith interest and penalty under Commercial or Industrial Construction Services (CICS). 2. The appellant has contented that (i) the said demand was confirmed without allowing 67% abatement under Notifi....

X X X X Extracts X X X X

Full Text of the Document

X X X X Extracts X X X X

....rvice tax leviable would come to Rs. 5,63,855/- and the appellant has already paid Rs. 8,85,857/- for the period 01.06.2007 onwards. 3. Per-contra, ld. D.R. for Revenue stated that no evidence was given to the effect that the material cost was 79% of the gross value and that the case may have to be remanded for recomputation of demand in the light of L & T judgements. 4. We have considered the c....

Previous Next

Contact Us At :

FAQs :

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

2016 (6) TMI 775