<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 775 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329066</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for de-novo adjudication, setting aside the demand pre-01.06.2007 and directing a recomputation of the demand for the subsequent period based on Rule 2A. The appellant was granted an opportunity to be heard, and the penalty amount was to be redetermined accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 12:13:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 775 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329066</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for de-novo adjudication, setting aside the demand pre-01.06.2007 and directing a recomputation of the demand for the subsequent period based on Rule 2A. The appellant was granted an opportunity to be heard, and the penalty amount was to be redetermined accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329066</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>