2016 (5) TMI 358

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....The impugned order dated 28th March, 2016 attaches the Petitioner's immovable property as well as movable property as listed out in Exh. A1 to A6. 2. On 12th April, 2016, this Petition was on board for urgent relief. After hearing the parties, we directed that the attachment of business receivables as listed out in the order date 28th March, 2016 being Exh. A6 to the Petition be vacated. This was by following the decision of this Court in Gandhi Trading v/s. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Others 239 ITR 337. The setting aside of the order dated 28th March, 2016 being Exh. A6 to the Petition by the order dated 12th April, 2016 is accepted by both the sides. 3. Mr. Mistri, learned Senior Counsel states that on 31st March, 2016, ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....agreed to the above course of action, we give the following further directions: (i) In the event the Assessing Officer decides the stay application against the Petitioner, then in terms of the CBDT instructions, an application to the next superior authority i.e. Additional Commissioner and/or the Commissioner would be filed by the Petitioner within one week from the date of the Assessing Officer's order, rejecting the stay application being communicated to the Petitioner; (ii) The Respondent-Revenue will not act further upon the impugned notice dated 28th March, 2016 being Exh.A1 to A5 till such time as the Petitioner's application is disposed of by the next superior of the Assessing Officer i.e.Additional Commissioner/ Commission....