https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327377 The court directed that if the Assessing Officer rejects the stay application, the petitioner can apply to the next superior authority within a week. The Revenue was instructed not to take further action on the impugned notices until the petitioner's application is decided and for three weeks thereafter to allow for legal remedies. The attachment orders were to remain undisturbed, with the petitioner undertaking not to dispose of the attached property. The court emphasized that its observations should not influence the decision-making process of the tax authorities. It was also mandated that the application process be expedited, and the time taken for this process would not count towards the life of the attachment orders under Section 281B(2) of the Act. en-us Tue, 03 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 May 2016 23:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327377 The court directed that if the Assessing Officer rejects the stay application, the petitioner can apply to the next superior authority within a week. The Revenue was instructed not to take further action on the impugned notices until the petitioner's application is decided and for three weeks thereafter to allow for legal remedies. The attachment orders were to remain undisturbed, with the petitioner undertaking not to dispose of the attached property. The court emphasized that its observations should not influence the decision-making process of the tax authorities. It was also mandated that the application process be expedited, and the time taken for this process would not count towards the life of the attachment orders under Section 281B(2) of the Act. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 03 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327377