TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2016 (5) TMI 279
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....2008-09; 1.2 On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the CIT(A) erred on facts in arriving a decision that the appellant itself has offered interest at the rate of 11.96% which has to be taken as basis while working out the amount of adjustment; 1.3 On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the CIT(A) erred by ignoring the case law in the case of CIT v. Indo American Jewellery Ltd., (Bombay High Court) 44 taxmann.com 310 wherein Hon'ble High Court has held that no interest can be imputed on outstanding balances having comparable aging from AE if no interest is charged by the taxpayer from outstanding balances of Non-AE; 1.4 On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the CIT(A) erred by ignoring the case law in the case of CIT v. U. K. Bose- (Delhi High Court) 29 taxmann.com 219 wherein Hon'ble High Court has held that right to receive interest and liability to pay interest arose in respect of the same period and out of the same event i.e. non payment of sale proceeds in time, it afforded sufficient nexus between two to justify applicability of principles of netting; 1.5 The Appe....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rial facts will have to be taken note of. The assessee is engaged in the business of manufacturing and exporting diamond studded gold jewellery. The exports made to the AE is benchmarked on the basis of the transactional net margin method (TNMM) and the TPO has accepted the same. However, an adjustment of Rs. 1,72,69,053 is made in respect of delayed realization of debts. The assessee's argument that no such interest is charged from the non AEs was noted and brushed aside. It was also noted that in many cases the assessee has received advance payments from the AEs as well. He also noted that 'the business prudence or necessity of extending credit to the AE is not relevant for computing arm's length price in unrelated (sic- related) party transactions". It was also noted that lending or borrowing is not the man business of the company and that the assessee has extended the credit facility to the AE. The TPO, thus, proposed an arm's length price adjustment for delay in realization of trade debts, by adopting 14.21% interest for the period of delay. Aggrieved, assessee carried the matter in appeal but without any success. The assessee is not satisfied and is in further appeal before u....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....our of the assessee, by observing as follows: 12. In our considered view, even if we proceed on the basis that Explanation to Section 92B is indeed retrospective in effect and it does cover delay in realization of debts, as long as sale is benchmarked on TNMM basis, as in this situation before us, there cannot be any occasion to make a separate adjustment for delay in realization of debts. The reason is that the interest income is an integral part of the PBIT inasmuch as interest income, in cases other than finance companies, is required to be included in the 'other income' and thus affects the profit before interest and taxes. While profit before interest and taxes does not take into account 'interest expenditure', it does take into account 'interest income' because the interest income is part of the 'other income', under pre amended as well as post amended schedule VI to the Companies Act, which is duly taken into account into computation of PBIT. In a way PBIT is a misnomer, as while PBIT does not take into account interest expenditure, it does take into account interest incomeappearing in the other income. Once the profitability, as per PBIT, is found to be comparable,....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e than in case 1, but the purchase price being lower, the Indian AE gets adequately compensated and, therefore, no transfer pricing adjustment is required. In case we treat the AMP expenses in case 2 as Rs. 501-, i.e. identical as case 1 and AMP of Rs. 100 as a separate transaction, the position in case 2 would be: Particulars Case 2 Sales 1,000 Purchase Price 500 Gross Margin 500 (50%) Overhead expenses 300 Marketing expenses 50 Net profit 150 (15%) It is obvious that this would not be the correct way and method to compute the arm's length price. The purchase price adjustments/set off would be mandated to arrive at the arm's length price, if the AMP expenses are segregated as an independent international transaction....." 9. By the same logic, even making an adjustment for interest on excess credit allowed on sales to AEs will vitiate the picture, inasmuch as what has already been factored in the TNMM analysis, by taking operating profit figure which incorporate financial impact of the excess credit period allowed, will be adjusted again separately as well. Of course, in the example used by Hon'ble D....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....inished goods, is, therefore, somewhat fallacious in approach and untenable in law. In our considered view, merely because there is a delay in realization of debts cannot be reason enough to make an addition as long as such a delay is peculiar to the transactions with AEs. The adjustment before us is an adjustment to arrive at an arm's length price and unless there is something, more than sweeping generalizations as implicit in the arguments before us, to at least indicate that such a delay in realization of debts in similar transactions is absent in arm's length transactions, these adjustments cannot be made even when sales are benchmarked on CUP basis. The delay in realization of debts, resulting in a continuing debit balance, is not a standalone international transaction per se, but is a result of the international transaction as it only reflects that the related payment has not been made by the debtor. As for the learned Departmental Representative's stand that "the supplier is entitled to receipt of payment immediately on delivery irrespective of whether the finished goods is sold in the market, get spoiled in manufacturing or is damaged" would probably be valid in....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....) is of no assistance to the case of the revenue. The international transaction is exports of goods which been benchmarked on TNMM basis and which is duly accepted by the TPO. In view of these discussions, and respectfully following the decision of the coordinate bench in assessee's own case for the earlier years, we uphold the grievance of the assessee and direct the Assessing Officer to delete the impugned ALP adjustment of Rs. 2,10,95,346. 14. As regards learned Departmental Representative's contention that Sony Ericsson Mobile Corporation decision (supra) will not apply in the case before us in the context of interest on delayed realization of debts for the simple reason that while AMP expenses, as in that case, are taken into account in the computation of the PLI, interest on delayed realization of debts is not taken into account in computation of the PLI, we can only say that it proceeds on the fallacious assumption that interest income is not taken into account in computation of profit before interest and taxes. The profit before tax and interest (PBIT) so computed takes into account interest income because, on the given facts, it is in the nature of 'other inco....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....essing Officer, which was in respect of the interest rate on the basis of which ALP adjustment was required to be made, is rendered academic and it does not call for any adjudication at this stage. 19. There is, however, one more aspect of the matter for which the impugned ALP adjustment may be deleted. 20. In order to explain this line of reasoning, a few material factual developments and the legal analysis will have to be taken note of. We have noted that everything hinges on application of Explanation to Section 92B, vide Finance Act 2012, though with retrospective effect from 1st April 2002. This Explanation provides as follows: Explanation*: - For the removal of doubts, it is hereby clarified that - (*inserted by the Finance Act 2012, though with retrospective effect from 1st April 2002) (i) the expression "international transaction" shall include - (a) the purchase, sale, transfer, lease or use of tangible property including building, transportation vehicle, machinery, equipment, tools, plant, furniture, commodity or any other article, product or thing; (b) the purchase, sale, transfer, lease or use of intangible property,....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... employment agreements, union contracts; (i) location related intangible assets, such as, leasehold interest, mineral exploitation rights, easements, air rights, water rights; (j) goodwill related intangible assets, such as, institutional goodwill, professional practice goodwill, personal goodwill of professional, celebrity goodwill, general business going concern value; (k) methods, programmes, systems, procedures, campaigns, surveys, studies, forecasts, estimates, customer lists, or technical data; (l) any other similar item that derives its value from its intellectual content rather than its physical attributes.'. 21. Shortly before the 2012 amendments were brought, a coordinate bench of this Tribunal, in the case of Nimbus Communications Ltd Vs ACIT [(2011) 139 TTJ 214 (Bom)] and speaking through one of us, had observed as follows: 4. It is only elementary, in terms of the provisions of Section 92, any income arising from an international transaction has to be computed having regard to the arm's length price (ALP), and that this exercise includes the allowance for any expense or interest arising from an international tra....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rises, there has been any impact on profits, incomes, losses or assets of the assessee. In view of these discussions, in our considered view, a continuing debit balance per se, in the account of the associated enterprises, does not amount to an international transaction under section 92 B in respect of which ALP adjustments can be made. The factum of payment has to be considered vis-a-vis terms of payment set out in the transaction arrangement, and not in isolation with the commercial terms on which transaction in respect of which payment is, according to the revenue authorities, delayed. 22. We have noted the learned Departmental Representative's contention that the above decision is no longer good in law since a coordinate bench of this Tribunal, in the case of i-Gate Computer Systems Ltd Vs ACIT and vice versa (ITA No. 2504/PN/2012 has, inter alia, stated that "the Hon'ble Bombay High Court, in assessee's own case relating to the assessment year 2002-03 in Income Tax Appeal No. 1148/2012, vide judgment dated 28.2.2013, has held that in view of the amendment by the Finance Act 2012 with retrospective effect from 1st April 2002, the said transaction of charging of interes....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t have been, and there was no, adjudication on any legal issue. 27. It is for this reason that the said decision of the Pune bench of the Tribunal, relied upon by the learned Departmental Representative, is per incurium and does not bind the coordinate benches. 28. The question then is as to what is the impact of amendment in section 92B, by the virtue of Finance Act 2012, on the definition of 'international transaction' so far as the interest on delayed realization of debt is concerned. 29. The amendment so made by the Finance Act 2012, stated to be with retrospective effect 1st April 2002, inserts an Explanation to Section 92 B which, inter alia, that "For the removal of doubts, it is hereby clarified that (c) capital financing, including any type of long -term or short -term borrowing, lending or guarantee, purchase or sale of marketable securities or any type of advance, payments or deferred payment or receivable or any other debt arising during the course of business". In plain words, this amendment inter alia implies that capital financing of any type, including by way of "deferred payment or receivable or any other debt arising during the course of....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....there is a sound conceptual foundation, as has been highlighted in the binding judicial precedents that we will deal with in a short while, for that approach. There is no dearth of examples on this aspect of the matter. Take for example, the amendment to Section 263 by the Finance Act, 1961. In many judicial precedents, [such as in the case of CIT Vs Sunbeam Auto Limited (332 ITR 167) wherein it was held that "Learned counsel for the assessee is right in his submission that one has to keep in mind the distinction between "lack of inquiry" and "inadequate inquiry". If there was any inquiry, even inadequate that would not by itself give occasion to the CIT to pass orders under s. 263 of the Act, merely because he has different opinion in the matter. It is only in cases of "lack of inquiry" that such a course of action would be open"], it was reiterated that it was only the lack, not the adequacy, of inquiry which could confer jurisdiction under section 263 on the Commissioner. By inserting Explanation 2 to Section 263(1), which inter alia provided that powers under section 263 could also be invoked in the cases where "the order is passed without making inquiries or verification which....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
...., is whether a "clarificatory" amendment remains true to its nature when it purports to annul, or has the undeniable effect of annulling, an interpretation given by the courts to the term sought to be clarified. In other words, does the rule against clarificatory amendments laying down new principles of law extend to situations where law had been judicially interpreted and the legislature seeks to overcome it by declaring that the law in question was never meant to have the import given to it by the Court? The general position of the courts in this regard is where the purpose of a special interpretive statute is to correct a judicial interpretation of a prior law, which the legislature considers inaccurate, the effect is prospective. Any other result would make the legislature a court of last resort. United States v. Gilmore 8 Wall [(75 US) 330, 19L Ed 396 (1869)] Peony Park v. O'Malley [223 F2d 668 (8th Cir 1955)]. It does not mean that the legislature does not have the power to override judicial decisions which in its opinion it deems as incorrect, however to respect the separation of legal powers and to avoid making a legislature a court of last resort, the amendments can be mad....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nature of a SAAR (specific anti abuse rule), and that every anti abuse legislation, whether SAAR (specific anti abuse rule) or GAAR (general anti abuse rule), is a legislation seeking the taxpayers to organize their affairs in a manner compliant with the norms set out in such anti abuse legislation. An anti-abuse legislation does not trigger the levy of taxes; it only tells you what behavior is acceptable or what is not acceptable. What triggers levy of taxes is non-compliance with the manner in which the anti-abuse regulations require the taxpayers to conduct their affairs. In that sense, all anti abuse legislations seek a certain degree of compliance with the norms set out therein. It is, therefore, only elementary that amendments in the anti-abuse legislations can only be prospective. It does not make sense that someone tells you today as to how you should have behaved yesterday, and then goes on to levy a tax because you did not behave in that manner yesterday. 37. When this is put to the learned Departmental Representative that as to how the transfer pricing legislation can be expected to have a retrospective amendment, which is almost like telling people how they sho....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ance of Hon'ble Delhi High Court, would not alter the situation, and it can only be treated as prospective in effect i.e. with effect from 1st April 2012 onwards. 40. As we deal with this question, it is also relevant to consider whether this Tribunal can, while adjudicating on the appeals, tinker with the date, as set out in the statute, from which an amendment is effective. In our humble understanding, as a judicial forum, we are bound not only by the law as legislated by the legislature, but by the judge made law as well. We are a part of the judicial hierarchy in this system. We are bound by the law laid down by Hon'ble Courts above, and all that we are expected to do, and we do, is to decide the issues before us in accordance with the provisions of the statute, in accordance with the law laid down by Hon'ble Courts above and in the light of binding judicial precedents. When a binding judicial precedent requires us to deviate from the specific words of the provisions of the statute in a particular manner, we have to do so. There is no escape from this call of duty. Of course, whatever we do is, and shall always remain, subject to the approval by Hon'ble Courts above. ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....r as the legal framework is concerned, this provision is not for the purpose of penalizing for the tax deduction at source lapses. There are separate penal provisions to that effect. Deincentivizing a lapse and punishing a lapse are two different things and have distinctly different, and sometimes mutually exclusive, connotations. When we appreciate the object of scheme of section 40(a)(ia), as on the statute, and to examine whether or not, on a "fair, just and equitable" interpretation of law- as is the guidance from Hon'ble Delhi High Court on interpretation of this legal provision, in our humble understanding, it could not be an "intended consequence" to disallow the expenditure, due to non deduction of tax at source, even in a situation in which corresponding income is brought to tax in the hands of the recipient. The scheme of Section 40(a)(ia), as we see it, is aimed at ensuring that an expenditure should not be allowed as deduction in the hands of an assessee in a situation in which income embedded in such expenditure has remained untaxed due to tax withholding lapses by the assessee. It is not, in our considered view, a penalty for tax withholding lapse but it is a sort of ....