Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2010 (12) TMI 1205

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... case of earning of long term capital gain out of sale of penny stocks. Further, he narrated stating that, on hearing the market news that such earnings have to be offered by many others in the market as short term capital gains to avoid the litigation with the revenue, the assessee filed the revised return which happened to be belated return disclosing the correct particulars in the said return. Relevant paras 3, 4 and 4.1 of CIT(A) are as under:- "3. The facts of the case as per records are that the assessee has filed his original return consisting of income from long term capital gain of ₹ 8,86,540/- on account of sales of shares. Assessee subsequently filed revised return wherein the long term capital gain original shown was rev....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....urn filed by the assessee was not voluntary but as a result of the investigation carried out by the Investigation Wing of the Department. Further, it was also observed that the revised return filed by the assessee was not valid within the meaning of section 139(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It was observed that in case of assessee, the transactions in share were found to be non-genuine and the documents produced in support of such transaction were fabricated for which the capital gains shown by the assessee were treated as income from other sources. It was also stated that the assessee did not furnish any new evidence in the penalty proceedings to substantiate the different interpretation of capital gains claimed. It was thus, concluded t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rting his unaccounted money into accounted transaction by payment to meager tax. Assessee is benefited by offering the same under the head capital gains and not under the head income from other sources. He also highlighted furnishing of belated revised return which must not be taken into cognizance as it is invalid one in the sight of the law. As per the Revenue only the original return of income exists and the particulars furnished in the said valid return must only be reckoned. Further, Ld. DR relied on the citations reported in 186 ITR 571 and 222 ITR 496 and 299 ITR 179. 5. During the time of rebuttal, Ld. Counsel mentioned that the act of filing the revised return was belatedly showed the voluntary nature of the assessee in coming cle....