<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 1205 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181421</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune allowed the appeal of the assessee against the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal considered the voluntary nature of the revised return and the lack of incriminating evidence regarding penny stock transactions, concluding that it was not a fit case for penalty. The penalty was set aside in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2016 15:19:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424089" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 1205 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181421</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune allowed the appeal of the assessee against the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal considered the voluntary nature of the revised return and the lack of incriminating evidence regarding penny stock transactions, concluding that it was not a fit case for penalty. The penalty was set aside in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>