2016 (4) TMI 539
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Monga, AOR And Mr. Vipin Nair, Adv. For the Respondent : Mr. Maninder Singh, A.S.G., Ms. Madhurima Mridul, Adv., Mr. Vibhu Shankar Mishra, Adv., Ms. Sunita Sharma, Adv., Mr. Sudhir Aggarwal, Adv., Mr. Manish Vashistha, Adv., Mr. Mahaling Pandarge, Addl.Govt.Adv. And Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv. ORDER Delay condoned. Leave granted. Heard learned counsel for the parties.....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ich may be available to them in law. Therefore, the Order dated 8.10.2009 was not recalled and consequently Criminal Application No. 412/2010 in Criminal Writ Petition No. 398/2003 filed by the Competent Authority was rejected. Aggrieved of the order, the appellant and other persons filed application No. 87/2010 in the disposed of Criminal Writ Petition No. 398/2003. The Division Bench of the High....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ion No. 398/2003 wherein it is observed as follows: "...this Court applied the judgment, irrespective of pendency of this petition to the present petitioners as well, which in other words, would mean that the orders impugned in this petition against the petitioners already stand revoked. Therefore, we need not pass any further orders. However, notices have been served on the Petitioners i....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s in accordance with the law laid down by this Court and, thereafter, the Competent Authority determined the lis between the parties with regard to the confiscation and the Tribunal has confirmed it and the same is the subject matter of writ petition before the High Court. The High Court has observed that order stands revoked as being similar. However, it was submitted that notice in the case was ....
TaxTMI