https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326425 Confiscation proceedings under the NDPS Act required fresh judicial scrutiny where the High Court had not examined the notice, confiscation order and Tribunal confirmation on merits. The Supreme Court held that the rival claims should be considered afresh after giving both sides an opportunity of hearing, so the legality of the confiscation can be determined in accordance with law. The High Court's order was set aside and the matter was remitted for reconsideration on merits. en-us Thu, 17 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Oct 2016 15:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326425 Confiscation proceedings under the NDPS Act required fresh judicial scrutiny where the High Court had not examined the notice, confiscation order and Tribunal confirmation on merits. The Supreme Court held that the rival claims should be considered afresh after giving both sides an opportunity of hearing, so the legality of the confiscation can be determined in accordance with law. The High Court's order was set aside and the matter was remitted for reconsideration on merits. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 17 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326425