Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2012 (3) TMI 496

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....,27,70,141/- were the bills raised during the year, but the assessee accounted for the net commission at Rs. 41,19,613/-. He further noticed that the TDS was deducted on total contract amount of Rs. 96,32,530/-. On enquiry, assessee explained that some of the clients have deducted the tax on the reimbursed amounts also but the assessee's net commission was only Rs. 41,19,613/-. It filed various reconciliation statements. However, the Assessing Officer observed that the assessee did not explain the difference between Rs. 1.40 crores and Rs. 1.27 crores and further there were credits in the bank account to an extent of Rs. 1.60 crores and on the basis of the TDS certificates, the difference of Rs. 55,12,917/- was held to be the commission rec....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... receipt does not necessarily mean that the said receipt constitutes income of an assessee. Further the Authorized Representative has been able to reconcile the figures mentioned in the assessment order and bring out that the said amount of Rs. 1,40,54,731/- was not the correct figure and that the correct figures was Rs. 1,40,85,366/- which included an opening balance of debtors of Rs. 13,15,225/-. Clearly, no adjustment entries had been made by the appellant in their books to adjust or reduce the commission income received by them. Further, the Authorized Representative has been able to bring out that the Assessing Officer was wrongly guided by the impression that the credit entries in their bank account aggregated Rs. 1.60 crores. Ther....