1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tribunal upholds CIT (A) decision in revenue appeal case, emphasizing importance of reconciling receipts & expenditures. (A)</h1> The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)'s decision to delete the addition made by the Assessing Officer in a revenue appeal case. The Tribunal emphasized the ... - Issues involved: Revenue appeal against addition made by Assessing Officer on reconciliation of receipts with reference to TDS amounts.Summary:The Assessing Officer made an addition based on the difference between total receipts and billed amounts, holding that the unaccounted amount constituted commission received by the assessee. However, before the CIT (A), the assessee, a clearing and forwarding agent, explained that the amounts spent on behalf of clients were reimbursed on an actual basis, and all receipts were duly accounted for. The CIT (A) deleted the addition after considering various evidences and reconciliations, stating that TDS deduction does not automatically convert a receipt into income. The Revenue challenged this decision, but the Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)'s order, noting that the assessee had correctly reconciled the amounts received and explaining that TDS on reimbursed expenditures should not be treated as income. The Revenue appeal was dismissed.This judgment highlights the importance of properly reconciling receipts and expenditures, especially in cases involving TDS deductions. It clarifies that mere TDS deduction does not necessarily mean that the amount constitutes income, particularly when the expenses are reimbursed. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a thorough examination of all relevant facts and figures before making additions based on discrepancies in receipts and billed amounts.