Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2013 (9) TMI 1103

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ing the addition U/s 80IB of the I.T. Act made by AO amounting to Rs. 46,20,216/-. 3. The assessee business activity is not at all falling under manufacturing activities within the ambit of section 80IB of the I.T. Act. Therefore, the assessee is not entitled for deduction u/s 80IB of the I.T. Act. 2. Since all the grounds are interconnected, therefore, disposed off by this common order. 3. Short facts of the case are as under :   3.1 In the order passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 263, the A.O. disallowed entire claim of deduction u/s 80IB(4) with the following remarks: "The assessee company has claimed deduction u/s 80IB of Rs. 46,20,216/-. The total turnover of the assessee consists of the following: - SI. No. Particul....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s letter, the assessee filed its objection in its letter dated 26.07.2011 and submitted that the deduction u/s 80IB was allowed "in earlier A.Y. by the department in its case. It is also submitted that the assessee is in the business of manufacture of Turbo machinery parts, Components Viz. Compressor wheels, Compressor blades, Spacers etc. The Raw materials required for the said parts/ components are procured by the company and sometimes it is being supplied by the customers and the end product is commercially different from the materials out of which it is produced. The assessee has also quoted various Court findings which is favourable to it in this connection. The explanation submitted by the assessee has been carefully perused. It is as....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Act. Therefore, the assessee is not entitled for deductions u/s 80IB of the I.T.Act. In view of the above discussions, the deduction claimed u/s 80IB of Rs. 46,20,216/- is fully disallowed and added to the Returned Income." 3.2 Matter carried to CIT(A) and CIT(A) has allowed the claim by observing as under : "7. I have gone through the assessment order and have perused the submission of the appellant. The main issue in question is whether the activities carried on by the assessee is to be regarded as manufacturing or labour charges. In the assessment order, the A.O. has treated the activities of the Appellant Company as being engaged in assembling, processing, Job work, repairing and servicing etc. The main reason, why the A.O. has n....