<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 1103 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179977</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the deduction under section 80IB for the assessment year 2006-07, emphasizing the principle of consistency in tax assessments. The assessee&#039;s manufacturing activities were deemed eligible for the deduction, as previously accepted by the Department in earlier assessment years. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, underscoring the importance of adhering to past decisions unless significant changes in the case&#039;s facts and circumstances warrant otherwise.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2016 12:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=420068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 1103 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179977</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the deduction under section 80IB for the assessment year 2006-07, emphasizing the principle of consistency in tax assessments. The assessee&#039;s manufacturing activities were deemed eligible for the deduction, as previously accepted by the Department in earlier assessment years. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, underscoring the importance of adhering to past decisions unless significant changes in the case&#039;s facts and circumstances warrant otherwise.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>