Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (2) TMI 641

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... For the Petitioner : Mr. Prabhat Kumar (Advocate) For the Respondent : Mr. R.K. Mishra, DR ORDER PER B. RAVICHANDRAN: These 3 appeals are heard today. The Ld. Counsel for the appellants Sh. Prabhat Kumar submitted that proceedings were initiated against the appellants consequent on search and subsequent investigation in January 2001 by the officers of Central Excise Commissionarate, Delhi-....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... detailed written reply for the second SCN; could not attend personal hearing due to the reasons that they have been preparing to file application for settlement of the case before the Settlement Commission and the proprietor of one of the appellant (Goodway Electronics) was admitted in hospital. 3. The Ld. AR, Sh. R.K. Mishra submitted that the Commissioner has given due opportunities to the app....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f Central Excise Act, 1932 (non obtaining of Central Excise Registration). 6. Considering the above factual position, we find it will be fit and proper for the original authority to examine the case afresh with the appellants' defense in respect of second SCN dated 16.04.2004. This is necessary as there was no defense for the appellants during the original proceedings and the appellants made elab....