2016 (2) TMI 640

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....For the Respondent : Shri R.K Mishra, DR ORDER PER S.K. MOHANTY: These appeals are directed against the impugned order dated 22.03.2007 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals-II), Customs & Central Excise, Jaipur upholding the demand of central excise of Rs. 15,49,658/- and equal amount of penalty confirmed in the adjudication order. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellant is engag....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....arely covered by the decision of this Tribunal in the case of the appellant itself vide Order dated 18.01.2012 passed in Excise Appeal No.E/600 , 601, 603 of 2005 and Excise Appeal Nos.396 & 947 of 2006. 4. On the other hand, Shri R.K. Mishra, ld. AR appearing for the respondent reiterated the findings recorded in the impugned order. 5. We have heard ld. Counsels for both the sides and perused t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... JCB Ltd. (supra) it has been held by Hon'ble Apex Court that the place of removal in such cases is the factory gate and not the place at which goods are delivered. It has also been categorically ruled by the Apex Court that the cost of transportation from the factory gate to the premises of the buyers will not form part of the assessable value of the excisable goods. The only issue which may have....