Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2007 (4) TMI 137

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, hereinafter referred to as "the Act" for opinion of this court: "4. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was legally correct in cancelling the penalty of Rs. 59,126, Rs. 78,376 and Rs. 82,633 for the assessment years 1990-91, 1991-92, 1992-93, respectively, by holding that no penalty under the said section is exigible for fail....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....btaining audit report under section 44AB Audit report under section 44AB obtained on Return of income under section 139(1) due on Audit report under section 44AB filed along with return under section 139(4) on 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 30-11-1990 31-10-1991 31-10-1992 22-10-1990 31-10-1991 29-10-1992 30-11-1990 31-10-1991 31-10-1992 24-4-1991 2-12-1....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....relying upon the various decisions of the Tribunal wherein the ratio of the hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Hindustan Steel Ltd. v. State of Orissa [1972] 83 1TR 26 and in the case of CIT v. Vegetable Products Ltd. [1973] 88 ITR 192 (SC) were considered. 8 We have heard Sri A. N. Mahajan, learned standing counsel for the Revenue. Shri S. D. Singh has appeared for the respondent-assessee. ....