<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 137 - HIGH COURT, ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2287</link>
    <description>The Tribunal canceled penalties imposed under section 271B for failure to furnish audit reports along with returns under section 139(1) of the Income-tax Act. Relying on precedents like Hindustan Steel Ltd. v. State of Orissa and CIT v. Vegetable Products Ltd., the Tribunal held that obtaining audit reports before the specified date under section 44AB was sufficient, negating the need to furnish them before the Assessing Officer. The High Court had previously ruled similarly, finding the obligation under section 44AB met by obtaining the audit report before the specified date. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, rendering the penalties inapplicable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41655" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 137 - HIGH COURT, ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2287</link>
      <description>The Tribunal canceled penalties imposed under section 271B for failure to furnish audit reports along with returns under section 139(1) of the Income-tax Act. Relying on precedents like Hindustan Steel Ltd. v. State of Orissa and CIT v. Vegetable Products Ltd., the Tribunal held that obtaining audit reports before the specified date under section 44AB was sufficient, negating the need to furnish them before the Assessing Officer. The High Court had previously ruled similarly, finding the obligation under section 44AB met by obtaining the audit report before the specified date. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, rendering the penalties inapplicable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2287</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>