2016 (2) TMI 156

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....O. on account of non confirmation of advances by the parties, ignoring the fact that the assessee failed to produce any confirmation even during the course of appellate proceedings. 2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition of Rs. 3,63,750/- made by the A.O. on account of non confirmation of cash credits, ignoring the fact that the assessee failed to produce any confirmation even during the course of appellate proceedings. 3. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the Assessing officer framed the assessment u/s 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act') at an income of Rs. 3,11,714/- after making additions of Rs. 24,453/- and Rs. 8,100/- on....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....and report. The Assessing officer submitted remand report dated 29.10.2013 and a copy of the same was given to the assessee to furnish its comments. The assessee submitted his rejoinder vide its letter dated 22.11.2013. 4. The Ld. CIT(A) allowed a relief of Rs. 15,30,703/- to the assessee and confirmed the addition of Rs. 5,06,003/-. 5. We have heard the rival submissions and have also perused the materials available on record. Shri Sushil Kumar, Ld. DR submitted that the Ld. CIT(A) has not correctly appreciated the remand report submitted by the ITO, Ward-2, Panchkula dated 14.8.2013. In its report, the Assessing officer has categorically stated in para 2 of the report that assessee has not furnished the confirmations from the partie....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the case are that assessee filed return of income through electronically declaring income of Rs. 708587/- vide No, 99917300291009 on 29.10.2009 in the status of Firm. The notice u/s 143(2|/142(1) of the Act, issued on the same day and duly served upon the assessee on 16.7,2011. In response thereto Sh. Munish Mahendroo, C.A. attended the assessment proceedings on different dates and filed written submission. Books of accounts comprising cash book, ledger, stock Register, voucher of purchases and sales & expenses were produced which have been examined on test checked basis. The case was discussed in detail. The assessee has not furnished the confirmation of the following parties from whom advance has been claimed by the assessee in spite of r....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he assessment order, After repeated requests, the assessee has given confirmation of some of the parties but no PAN has been mentioned on the letter head of the party. In the absence of PAN the AO was right to add back the cash credit amounting to Rs. 363750/- as unexplained. The assessment record of M/s. C Max Healthcare, #. 13, Sec-16, Panchkula for the AY 2009-10 is also enclosed herewith in one volume for necessary action. Yours faithfully Sd/- (ANITA SHARMA) INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2, PANCHKULA End: As above" 6. From the above report, it is clear that the assessee did not furnish the confirmation letters from the concerned parties. It appears that assessee did not cooperate with the Assessin....