https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271451 The ITAT Chandigarh set aside the CIT(A)'s order, remanding both issues to the AO for fresh examination. The AO's additions of Rs. 15,30,700 and Rs. 3,63,750 on account of non-confirmation of advances and cash credits, respectively, were challenged. The ITAT directed affording the assessee a reasonable opportunity and considering additional evidence. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing adherence to due process and legal requirements in the reassessment. en-us Thu, 10 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Feb 2016 06:15:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271451 The ITAT Chandigarh set aside the CIT(A)'s order, remanding both issues to the AO for fresh examination. The AO's additions of Rs. 15,30,700 and Rs. 3,63,750 on account of non-confirmation of advances and cash credits, respectively, were challenged. The ITAT directed affording the assessee a reasonable opportunity and considering additional evidence. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing adherence to due process and legal requirements in the reassessment. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 10 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271451