2007 (3) TMI 143

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... According to the facts of the case, the assessee is an individual deriving income from 13 AOPs as a member. For the assessment year 1983-84, the appellant derived Rs. 60,853 as share from 13 AOPs. She was having 1/3rd share in all these AOPs. The AOPs were beneficiaries of M/s. Chengamma Family Foundations, which is a private specific trust. 99 per cent. of the total income of the association of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....her, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is correct in holding that the assessee was not eligible for relief under section 86(v) as a member of the AOPs in respect of the specific portion of income of the AOPs on the ground that the said portion being below the taxable limit had not suffered tax in the hands of the AOPs." 2 Sri Shankar, learned counsel appears for th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....have held against the assessee. The assessee has been provided the partial benefits under section 86(v) of the Act. The assessee wants section 86(v) to be considered thereby he gets the entire benefits on the facts of this case. Section 167A would deal with association of persons—special cases. 5 Section 86(v) would read as under : "Income-tax shall not be payable by an assessee if the ass....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ome on which tax was paid by the association. 7 The wordings "any portion" and the wordings "in which income-tax has already been paid by the association" would evidence that the benefit is available only to that portion which has suffered tax and not for the whole amount. In fact, the Tribunal has chosen to consider this in its order. We are in agreement with the said findings of the Tribunal.....