<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 143 -  HIGH COURT, KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2040</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding that the appellant was not eligible for relief under section 86(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court emphasized that the rebate is only applicable to the portion of income on which tax has been paid by the association, not the entire amount as claimed by the assessee. The judgment highlighted the importance of adhering to the specific language and conditions of the tax provisions for claiming rebates on income from AOPs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 12:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 143 -  HIGH COURT, KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2040</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding that the appellant was not eligible for relief under section 86(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court emphasized that the rebate is only applicable to the portion of income on which tax has been paid by the association, not the entire amount as claimed by the assessee. The judgment highlighted the importance of adhering to the specific language and conditions of the tax provisions for claiming rebates on income from AOPs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>