Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (1) TMI 265

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nufacture of Zinc Oxide, Sodium Antimonate, Nickel Oxide, etc. and ere clearing the same on payment of duty. They were also manufacturing these goods on job work basis for M/s. Shambhu Traders Pvt. Ltd (hereinafter referred to as STPL) and such goods were being cleared on payment of duty at the value declared by STPL. The goods so manufactured for STPL were cleared on payment of duty to M/s. Videocon International Ltd to be used as input in their dutiable final products. A show cause notice dated 21.10.2005 was issued for the period 2001-2002 to 2003-2004 alleging that respondent had undervalued the goods manufactured for STPL on job work basis. The notice culminated in the Order-in-Original which confirmed the duty demand of Rs. 8,65,516/-....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of Respondent and has been rightly applied by the Commissioner. 5. We have heard both sides and perused the records carefully. At the outset, it has to be stated that the foremost issue for consideration is whether the Commissioner was right in holding that the demand is barred by limitation. The appellant urge that in the self assessment scheme, the responsibility of correct declaration rests with assessee. On scrutiny it was found that the price so declared was highly undervalued and that therefore extended period is invokable. On perusal of the Order-in-Original, it is seen that though the respondent assessee had raised the plea of limitation, the adjudicating authority has failed to consider the same, There is no discussion as to wheth....