2016 (1) TMI 255

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Respondent : Mr. T Promodkumar Chopda ORDER By consent, both the writ petitions are taken up for final disposal. 2. The petitioner has filed the present writ petitions, challenging the order of rejection of stay petition filed by the petitioner by the third respondent and consequential attachment made by the first respondent, attaching the bank accounts of the petitioner lying with the fourth....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on. Aggrieved against the same, the petitioner preferred an appeal, which was entertained, but no stay order was granted by the second respondent. Since the first respondent refused to grant stay, the petitioner moved an application for stay of collection of demand before the third respondent, who by order dated 19.11.2015 rejected the same and also directed the first respondent to enforce the dem....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d order, rejecting the petitioner's application seeking stay of collection of demand and directing the first respondent to effect the demand made against the petitioner, no recovery proceedings is initiated till date. 6. I have considered the rival contentions made on both sides and perused the materials available on record. 7. Admittedly, the third respondent, without adducing any reason, p....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ing counsel for the respondents, no recovery is made as on date. 8. Thus, considering the above stated facts, this Court is inclined to pass orders in the following terms: (i) The petitioner is directed to pay 30% of the demand made by the authority concerned; (ii) Since the bank accounts of the petitioner are attached, the authority concerned is permitted to realise 30% of the demand and direc....