<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 255 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270463</link>
    <description>The court directed the petitioner, a registered company, to pay 30% of the tax demand to lift the bank account attachment. The appellate authority was instructed to expedite the appeal process, ensuring a personal hearing for the petitioner. Recovery actions were prohibited until the appeal&#039;s conclusion. The court noted the lack of reasoning in the third respondent&#039;s order and the adverse impact of the attachment on the petitioner&#039;s business. Despite past opportunities for payment, no recovery proceedings had commenced. The court disposed of the writ petitions without costs, closing related miscellaneous petitions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2016 23:44:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 255 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270463</link>
      <description>The court directed the petitioner, a registered company, to pay 30% of the tax demand to lift the bank account attachment. The appellate authority was instructed to expedite the appeal process, ensuring a personal hearing for the petitioner. Recovery actions were prohibited until the appeal&#039;s conclusion. The court noted the lack of reasoning in the third respondent&#039;s order and the adverse impact of the attachment on the petitioner&#039;s business. Despite past opportunities for payment, no recovery proceedings had commenced. The court disposed of the writ petitions without costs, closing related miscellaneous petitions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270463</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>