Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (1) TMI 200

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rder, the Revenue preferred appeal before the Hon'ble High Court of Madras in C.M.A Nos 2199 to 2201/2008 and the Hon'ble High Court of Madras in its order dated 11.06.2015 remanded the appeals to the Tribunal. 2. The brief facts of the case are as follows:- a) The appellant has two factories. When their factory at Kovilpatti manufactures yarn and grey fabrics, their factory at Cuddalore christened as "Loyal Super Fabrics" processes both fabric and yarn manufactured at Kovilpatti. These two factories belong to M/s Loyal Textile Mills Limited in which the appellant herein is one of the Units. b) On getting due permission from the department, the Kovilpaatti factory sent yarn and fabric to the Cuddalore Factory wi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r to the Tribunal for deciding the effect of the permission given by the Jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner for clearance of yarn. Vide paras 5, 6, 7 and 8 of its order, the Hon'ble High Court had directed the Tribunal to decide the short question of fact and the said paragraphs are reproduced below for better appreciation of the case. "5. Even at the outset, this Court is of the considered opinion that the matter requires to be remanded on a short question of fact and there is no need for this Court to give a finding on the above question of law. As is evident from the order of the Tribunal, on the basis of the pleading of the respondent, which has taken a plea before the Tribunal that on the strength of the permission ranted t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....been taken by the 2nd respondent/assessee in the appeal before the Tribunal. A copy of the said letter addressed by the Superintendent of Central Excise to the assessee has been placed before this Court, which has also been recorded by the Tribunal in its order. Though, the said letter was before the Tribunal and forms part of its order, however, this question of fact, which is disputed by the Revenue, has not been addressed by the Tribunal. Once a finding is recorded by the Tribunal on facts, it is supposed to address each and every issue that is placed before it by the parties on such fact. As to the Excise to the assessee granting permission has to be necessarily addressed by the Tribunal with regard to the claim of the assessee that in ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sion for yarn. 5. Before the High Court, the assessee submitted that necessary permissions were obtained for yarn also and the same were placed before the Tribunal at the time of argument. The Honble High Court thought it fit to remand the matter to the Tribunal for a finding of the fact as to the existence of permission for removal of yarn without payment of duty. 6. The assessee submitted that there is no dispute as to the existence of the permission for fabric from Kovilpatti factory to Cuddalore factory. The present appeal is confined to existence of the permission for yarn from Kovilpatti factory to Cuddalore factory and return. Permission was granted by the Asst Commissioner of Central Excise, Kovilpatti Division, vide his lett....