Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (1) TMI 199

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....alling under Chapter 72, 73 and 84 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (CETA). It was noticed that they had classified the product Rough Forging under Chapter Heading No. 7326 of CETA till 31.3.2004 and subsequently from 01.04.2004 they classified the product under Chapter Heading 7216 and 7214 claiming the benefit of Notification No. 6/2002 as amended. Show-cause notice dated 07.07.2005 was issued to the respondent directing them to show cause as to why the product should not be classified under 7326 instead of 7214 as has been claimed by them. The show-cause notice was contested before the adjudicating authority. The adjudicating authority after considering the submissions made, did not agree with the contentions raised and confirmed t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nder sub-Heading No. 7208.00. Subsequently, on 01.03.1998 Chapter No. 72 and 73 of CETA were fully aligned with HSN which would amount that the products manufactured by the respondent would fall under Chapter Heading 73. He would submit that the Boards Circular No. 139/79/87-CX-4 dated 18.9.1989 need to be seen and it indicates that after 01.03.1988 forging of Iron and Steel would fall under Chapter Headings 73, 84, 85, 86. 4. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent would draw our attention to the findings recorded by the first appellate authority and the adjudicating authority. He would submit that the first appellate authority has correctly reproduced the manufacturing activity of the products manufactured and it is open for....