2015 (12) TMI 18
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....wal, Adv For the Respondent : Shri Mrigank Prabhakar, Adv ORDER Per R K Singh Stay application along with appeal has been filed against order-in-original dated 24.2.2014 in terms of which service tax demand of Rs. 103,69,88,179/- for the period 2007-2008 to 2011-2012 (along with interest and penalties) was confirmed under renting of immovable property service. [Section 65 (105)(zzzz) o....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....he year 2010 with retrospective effect and the said amendment came into effect on 1.7.2010. (iv) There was no wilful mis-statement, or suppression of facts. 3. The ld. DR, on the other hand strenuously argued that the appellant was clearly guilty of suppression of facts as they did not provide information in spite of numerous reminders. He said that the adjudicating authority had only taken ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....n the case of Home Solution Retail India Ltd (supra) though that judgement was reversed by Delhi High Court in its subsequent judgement in 2011 as stated earlier. It clearly shows that there were questions as well as ambiguity about the impugned service. The definition of taxable service was also amended with effect from 1.6.2010. We do note that the figures submitted by the appellant at different....
TaxTMI