<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 18 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268714</link>
    <description>The tribunal denied constitutional immunity to the appellant from service tax liability for renting immovable property service from 2007-2008 to 2011-2012. Despite acknowledging legal ambiguity and discrepancies in figures, it ordered a pre-deposit of &amp;amp;8377;18 crores with interest within four weeks and stayed recovery of the remaining liability pending appeal, subject to compliance by a specified date. Failure to comply would result in appeal dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2015 11:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 18 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268714</link>
      <description>The tribunal denied constitutional immunity to the appellant from service tax liability for renting immovable property service from 2007-2008 to 2011-2012. Despite acknowledging legal ambiguity and discrepancies in figures, it ordered a pre-deposit of &amp;amp;8377;18 crores with interest within four weeks and stayed recovery of the remaining liability pending appeal, subject to compliance by a specified date. Failure to comply would result in appeal dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268714</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>