Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2008 (4) TMI 720

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e opinion of this Court under s. 256(1) of the IT Act, 1961 (the Act) at the instance of the CIT. R.A. No. 713/Ahd/1997 : Whether the Tribunal is right in law and on facts in cancelling the penalty levied under s. 271D ? Whether the Tribunal has correctly appreciated the facts on records so as to cancel the penalty levied ? R.A. No. 714/Ahd/1997 : Whether the Tribunal is right in law and on fact....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....l transactions in the name of Manal Anandkumar was ₹ 18,374. Therefore, for the financial year 1989-90 the opening balance was ₹ 18,374. Cheque of ₹ 15,000 was given on 25th July, 1989 and ₹ 5,000 on 23rd Oct., 1989. The cheque were also given on 15th Dec., 1989 and 20th Dec., 1989, only a sum of ₹ 2,100 was paid in cash. It was submitted that this payment was not bus....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Tribunal that the assessee has reasonable cause in accepting the amount in cash. 6. In relation to the two questions referred under reference application No. 714/Ahd/1997, the AO noted that the assessee had paid certain amount in cash totalling to ₹ 2,11,531 and, therefore, imposed a penalty of ₹ 71,500 under s. 271E of the Act. The CIT(A) confirmed the said penalty. 7. In the appe....