<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 720 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175429</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to cancel penalties under sections 271D and 271E of the Income Tax Act, as the Tribunal correctly appreciated the facts. The judgment favored the assessee, ruling that penalties were not justified due to reasonable cause for accepting cash and common trading practices between sister concerns.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 17:45:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405943" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 720 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175429</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to cancel penalties under sections 271D and 271E of the Income Tax Act, as the Tribunal correctly appreciated the facts. The judgment favored the assessee, ruling that penalties were not justified due to reasonable cause for accepting cash and common trading practices between sister concerns.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175429</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>