Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2015 (11) TMI 824

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....For the Respondent : Shri L Paneer Selvam, AC (AR) ORDER Per R Periasami 1. Revenue filed this appeal against OIA No.47/07 dt. 31.7.2007. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the respondent's one of the units located at Tiruvottiyur are registered with Central Excise for manufacture of truck tyres, flaps, tractor tyres etc. They are also engaged in export of various tyres and fl....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....l of the assessee. Hence the present appeal by Revenue. 3. Ld. A.R reiterates the grounds of appeal and submits that respondents received packing material but cleared to their own Export Processing Godown (EPG)which is a bonded warehouse and availed cenvat credit but not reversed the credit while removing the packing materials to their EPG and not followed the procedure. The Commissioner (Appea....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....2007 while passing the impugned order. He submits that Revenue has not filed any appeal against the earlier order. He submits that Revenue cannot raise a new ground. He submits para-9 of the SCN alleges and para-13 invokes Rule 3 (4) of CCR where the allegation is input is cleared "as such" whereas in the grounds of appeal, Revenue has come out with a new ground that packing material is not an in....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....use and the packing material used in the finished goods which are ultimately exported from the bonded warehouse at EPG and also there is no dispute on the export of finished goods which contained packing material from the EPG and the appellant followed procedure under Central Excise Rules and duly followed CT-2 procedure as per notification 43/2007 dt. 26.6.2007. The respondents are eligible for c....