Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cenvat credit taken on packing materials was required to be reversed when the materials were cleared under CT-2 certificate to the assessee's Export Processing Godown for use in export goods.
Analysis: The packing materials were admittedly eligible inputs, and they were cleared to the assessee's own Export Processing Godown for packing goods meant for export under bond. The clearances were effected in accordance with the Central Excise procedure and Notification No. 43/2007. In these circumstances, the bar under Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules did not apply, and the materials were not being removed as such for domestic consumption. The credit, therefore, was not liable to be reversed merely because the materials moved to the export godown under CT-2 procedure.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to retain the cenvat credit and the demand for reversal was not sustainable.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed and the impugned order allowing the assessee's claim was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Where eligible packing materials are cleared under bond for use in export goods through a bonded export godown in compliance with the prescribed excise procedure, cenvat credit is not required to be reversed.