Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2010 (6) TMI 765

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....at ld. CIT(A) has given directions to carry forward the unabsorbed expenditure over income to subsequent years for the adjustment against receipt/income of subsequent years for treating as application in such subsequent years. 3. The facts of the case are that assessee is a society registered under the Societies Registration Act for advancement and promotion of science and technology and dissemination of information relating to science and technology by developing Science City Project. For Asst. Year 2006-07 grant in aid amounting to Rs. 34.96 crores were treated as revenue receipts and thus included in the income for the purpose of calculating 85% of such income as application. The matter went to Tribunal which vide its order in ITA No.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....religions purposes. Subsequently, no doubt, similar exemption has been provided by the Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1989 with effect from 1-4-I989 by inserting subclause (d) in section 11(1). In view of this fact, we are of the view that the grant in aid received by the assessee to form part of the corpus cannot be held to be the income of the assessee and assessee will be entitled for the exemption u/s.11(l)(d) of the Act. We accordingly, set aside the order of the CIT(A) on this issue allowing the grounds of appeal of the assessee bearing Ground Nos. 1 to 3 in AY 2005-06 and dismiss the appeal of the revenue in A Y 2004-05." It is held that the grant-in-aid received by the assessee will form part of the corpus and would not be held as....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....g the income are applied, it is but natural that the adjustment of the expenses incurred by the trust for charitable and religious purposes in the earlier year against income earned by the trust in the subsequent year will have to be regarded as application of income of the trust for charitable and religious purposes in the subsequent year in which such adjustment has been made having regard to the benevolent provisions contained in section 11 of the Act and will have to be excluded from the income of the trust under section 11(1)(a) of the Act. In view of the above discussion, we are of the opinion that, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee is entitled to carry forward expenses for set off in the subsequent ye....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....is order. Thus the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed. Asst. Year 2007-08 7. In this year following ground is raised by the Revenue :- (1) The ld. CIT(A) was not justified in deleting the addition made on account of a grant of Rs. 31,03,25,670/- received treated as income and allowed to carry forward the deficit of income over the expenditure. 8. The issue involved is carry forward of unabsorbed application to subsequent years for being treated as application in such subsequent years to be adjusted against receipts/income of that subsequent year. 9. We have heard the parties and carefully perused the material on record. The issue is covered by the decision of Jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT vs. Shri Plot Sweta....