<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 765 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175356</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the orders of the ld. CIT(A) in both Asst. Years 2006-07 and 2007-08, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals. The Tribunal determined that unabsorbed expenditure over income could be carried forward to subsequent years for adjustment against receipt/income, in line with decisions of the Jurisdictional High Court. The Tribunal considered grants-in-aid as contributions to corpus and excluded them from income computation under section 11.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2015 18:10:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405641" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 765 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175356</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the orders of the ld. CIT(A) in both Asst. Years 2006-07 and 2007-08, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals. The Tribunal determined that unabsorbed expenditure over income could be carried forward to subsequent years for adjustment against receipt/income, in line with decisions of the Jurisdictional High Court. The Tribunal considered grants-in-aid as contributions to corpus and excluded them from income computation under section 11.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175356</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>